Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1777226 - rpm: Backport of caret versioning broke mock bootstrap chroots
Summary: rpm: Backport of caret versioning broke mock bootstrap chroots
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rpm
Version: 8.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Packaging Maintenance Team
QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-11-27 08:27 UTC by Florian Weimer
Modified: 2019-11-27 11:05 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rpm-4.14.2-35.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-27 09:09:11 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1654901 0 low CLOSED RFE: rpm should support upstream caret versioning 2023-06-16 10:11:37 UTC

Internal Links: 1654901

Description Florian Weimer 2019-11-27 08:27:34 UTC
The backports for bug 1654901 include this patch:

| From: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain>
| Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:59:19 +0100
| Subject: [PATCH 1/3] build: make haveRichDep aware of other fields allowed to
|  have them
| 
| Recommends/Suggests/Supplements/Enhances can also have rich deps,
| so we need to extend the check. Or remove it.

This causes glibc-langpack-* packages to have rpmlib(RichDependencies) <= 4.12.0-1 dependencies, which in turn causes mock to to bail out during the bootstrap chroot setup:

Start(bootstrap): cleaning dnf metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning dnf metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 1.4.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.21
Start(bootstrap): yum install
Failed to set locale, defaulting to C
[…]
ERROR You need to update rpm to handle:
rpmlib(RichDependencies) <= 4.12.0-1 is needed by glibc-langpack-zu-2.28-97.el8.x86_64

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2019-11-27 08:55:12 UTC
You should be able to use Mock using
  https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-container-for-bootstrap

However, IMO the use of RichDeps in glibc (or anything in @buildsys group) would be nice to postpone till death of RHEL7.

Comment 3 Panu Matilainen 2019-11-27 08:56:16 UTC
Folks, calm down. That patch was mistakenly included in the backport. I've reverted it and building now.

Comment 4 Panu Matilainen 2019-11-27 09:09:11 UTC
The problematic patch reverted, and thus issue fixed, in rpm-4.14.2-35.el8.

Thanks Florian for reporting!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.