Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1887453 - Review Request: richacl - Rich Access Control List utilities and dynamic library
Summary: Review Request: richacl - Rich Access Control List utilities and dynamic library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-10-12 14:10 UTC by Elvin Sindrilaru
Modified: 2020-11-06 05:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-06 05:54:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Elvin Sindrilaru 2020-10-12 14:10:03 UTC 
Spec URL: http://storage-ci.web.cern.ch/storage-ci/eos/citrine-depend/el-8/SRPM/richacl.spec
SRPM URL: http://storage-ci.web.cern.ch/storage-ci/eos/citrine-depend/el-8/SRPM/richacl-1.12-9.fc32.src.rpm
Description: Rich Access Control Lists: utilities and dynamic library
Fedora Account System Username: esindril
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Hi,

Could you please review the following package for inclusion in EPEL8? It already exists in EPEL7 and Fedora releases but it's missing from CentOS8. This is exactly the same version included in EPEL7 and Fedora releases i.e. 1.12-1.

Successful build for EPEL8:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53288539

This is the first time I push a package for review, therefore I am in need for a sponsor.

Thank you!
Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2020-11-06 05:54:05 UTC 
If the package already exists in Fedora, you don't need a re-review, you need instead to contact the maintainer to ask them to package it for EPEL8.

I suggest you file a bug requesting it here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&component=richacl
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.