Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 189084 - Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames
Summary: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 189081
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-04-15 19:26 UTC by Steven Pritchard
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-07 21:01:15 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steven Pritchard 2006-04-15 19:26:16 UTC 
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames/perl-Graphics-ColorNames.spec
SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-1.06-1.src.rpm
Description:
This module defines RGB values for common color names. The intention is to
(1) provide a common module that authors can use with other modules to
specify colors; and (2) free module authors from having to "re-invent the
wheel" whenever they decide to give the users the option of specifying a
color by name rather than RGB value.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-04-23 04:49:17 UTC 
One duplicated dependency:

perl(Module::Load)
perl(Module::Load) >= 0.1

not a blocker.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
conforms to the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   0551cb0b17babcbdef284d5b502731a4  Graphics-ColorNames-1.06.tar.gz
   0551cb0b17babcbdef284d5b502731a4  Graphics-ColorNames-1.06.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, i386).
* rpmlint is silent.
O final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED
Comment 2 Steven Pritchard 2006-05-07 21:01:15 UTC 
Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.