Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 192695 - multilib -devel conflicts for libbttcl
Summary: multilib -devel conflicts for libbttcl
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libbtctl
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Harald Hoyer
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: multilibdevel
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-05-22 18:03 UTC by Jeremy Katz
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-31 11:46:38 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jeremy Katz 2006-05-22 18:03:02 UTC 
The package contains conflicting -devel packages for multilib arches.

libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-6.i386.rpm
Preparing...                ##################################################
        file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libbtctl/BtctlController.html from install
of libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-6 conflicts with file from package libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-
6
        file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libbtctl/BtctlObex.html from install of lib
btctl-devel-0.6.0-6 conflicts with file from package libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-6
        file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libbtctl/ch01.html from install of libbtctl
-devel-0.6.0-6 conflicts with file from package libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-6
        file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libbtctl/ch02.html from install of libbtctl
-devel-0.6.0-6 conflicts with file from package libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-6
        file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libbtctl/ch03.html from install of libbtctl
-devel-0.6.0-6 conflicts with file from package libbtctl-devel-0.6.0-6

(etc, for all gtk-doc)
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2006-09-29 14:02:19 UTC 
Please, it is not that hard to just include  pregenerated docs as a separate tarball
Comment 2 Harald Hoyer 2006-09-29 16:34:32 UTC 
so, you say, that instead we fix the source of the problem, which affects more
than one package, I should workaround it?
Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2006-09-29 16:49:57 UTC 
The source of the problem is that the upstream tarball ships without formatted docs.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.