Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 192854 - /usr/lib/syslinux is not owned by any package
Summary: /usr/lib/syslinux is not owned by any package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: syslinux
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Jones
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC6Target FC7Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-05-23 16:59 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2013-01-10 03:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-19 20:16:23 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2006-05-23 16:59:28 UTC 
Description of problem:
/usr/lib/syslinux is not owned by any package, but should be owned by syslinux,
as the syslinux rpm package is delivering its content.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
syslinux-3.10-2.2

How reproducible:
rpm -qf /usr/lib/syslinux

Expected results:
Please apply the following patch (or better):

--- snipp ---
--- syslinux.spec       2006-02-07 14:55:46.000000000 +0100
+++ syslinux.spec.rsc   2006-05-23 19:01:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
 %{_bindir}/ppmtolss16
 %{_bindir}/lss16toppm
 %{_bindir}/gethostip
+%dir %{_prefix}/lib/syslinux
 %{_prefix}/lib/syslinux/*.com
 %{_prefix}/lib/syslinux/*.exe
 %{_prefix}/lib/syslinux/*.c32
--- snapp ---
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2006-09-23 17:25:09 UTC 
Peter, ping?
Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2006-10-14 10:38:42 UTC 
Why is just *nobody* interested in fixing this?
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2006-12-19 23:08:41 UTC 
Re-asking: Why is just *nobody* interested in fixing this trivial problem?
Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2006-12-20 19:01:20 UTC 
Probably because this is such a trival problem, that it is being overlooked
while working on far more important problems.
Comment 5 Jesse Keating 2007-01-19 20:16:23 UTC 
Built for rawhide.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.