Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1933315 - Review Request: rubygem-rexml - An XML toolkit for Ruby
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rexml - An XML toolkit for Ruby
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1923630
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-26 17:18 UTC by Michel Alexandre Salim
Modified: 2021-03-01 05:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-01 05:53:30 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2021-02-26 17:18:57 UTC 
Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ruby/rubygem-rexml.spec
SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/ruby/rubygem-rexml-3.2.4-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description:
An XML toolkit for Ruby.

This used to be part of Ruby but is moved out in Ruby 3.0: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16485

Fedora Account System Username: salimma
Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2021-02-27 13:18:42 UTC 
rubygem-rexml is available on Fedora 34 and above, built from ruby srpm:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1678059

Why do you want to package this?
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2021-02-27 13:22:15 UTC 
By the way, as already mentioned in bug 1923630 , the reason prawn-svg FTBFS is due to keyword separation change in ruby 3.0, not due to rubygem(rexml) not available (actually rubygem(rexml) is available)
Comment 3 Michel Alexandre Salim 2021-03-01 05:53:30 UTC 
Yup, missed checking the ruby spec, sorry
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.