Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1943045 - openssl-ibmca: FTBFS with upcoming autoconf-2.71
Summary: openssl-ibmca: FTBFS with upcoming autoconf-2.71
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openssl-ibmca
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Horák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1942967
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-03-25 12:46 UTC by Ondrej Dubaj
Modified: 2021-05-04 08:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-04 08:20:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ondrej Dubaj 2021-03-25 12:46:47 UTC 
Your package fails to build with the newest upcoming autoconf-2.71, which is part of a wide Fedora change. Please see the attached copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/odubaj/autoconf-2.70/packages/. More information about testing your package when building with autoconf available here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271#How_To_Test
Comment 1 Ondrej Dubaj 2021-04-12 07:18:39 UTC 
Gentle ping.
Comment 2 Ondrej Dubaj 2021-05-04 07:55:57 UTC 
Gentle ping.
Comment 3 Dan Horák 2021-05-04 08:01:18 UTC 
It is expected that non-x86 package will fail to build in x86_64 buildroot.
Comment 4 Ondrej Dubaj 2021-05-04 08:12:27 UTC 
We also provide a way to test non-x86_64 arch packages. Please see this section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271#How_To_Test. If everything works as expected, please give us feedback.

Thank you!
Comment 5 Dan Horák 2021-05-04 08:20:07 UTC 
I have tested the builds natively before closing, it builds OK. The report itself is a false positive.
Comment 6 Ondrej Dubaj 2021-05-04 08:20:49 UTC 
Thanks for clarification!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.