Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock build for i386 development is successfull.

MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
     - MUST: dist tag is present
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package perl-Calender-Simple,
in the format perl-Calender-Simple.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
      - MUST: The License field in the package perl-Calender-Simple.spec file
matches the actual license file COPYING in tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.
      * Source URL is Not present.
      I need to remove DA from URL. Working Source URL for me
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DAVECROSS/Calendar-Simple-1.13.tar.gz
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct

Fixed Source0.

Updated packages soon available at:
ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/packman/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Calendar-Simple.spec
ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/packman/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Calendar-Simple-1.13-2.src.rpm

Review:

- rpmlint clean
- package and spec naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- license is same as perl, matches spec
- spec file written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream
- package builds ok in mock (devel i386)
- BR's OK
- no locales, libraries, subpackages, or pkgconfigs to worry about
- no relocatable
- no dorectory ownership or permissions issues
- no duplicate files
- %clean section present and correct
- macro usage is consistent
- code not content
- no large docs, docs don't affect runtime
- not a GUI app, no desktop file needed
- no scriptlets

The only small cosmetic nit is that the rpm tag values seems to be misaligned
(I tried tab stops of 4 and 8, and neither were pretty)

Approved.

Thanks for the review, indentation modified after cvs import.