Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 202379 - Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf
Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-GConf
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-08-14 01:02 UTC by Chris Weyl
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-08-23 03:24:34 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Weyl 2006-08-14 01:02:44 UTC

This module allows you to use the GConf configuration system in order to
store/retrieve the configuration of an application. The GConf system is a
powerful configuration manager based on a user daemon that handles a set of
key and value pairs, and notifies any changes of the value to every program
that monitors those keys. GConf is used by GNOME 2.x.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-08-18 20:25:06 UTC
I'll review this, but I'm not sure I can test it as I'm not a gnome user
(partially because of gconf itself).

Unfortunately, the build fails for me:

+ /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'OPTIMIZE=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-m64 -mtune=generic'
*** can not find package gconf-2.0 >= 2.0.0
*** check that it is properly installed and available in PKG_CONFIG_PATH
 at Makefile.PL line 44
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14178 (%build)

Looks like a missing BR: GConfig2-devel.  I replaced the unnecessary BR: perl
with that (^_^) and now it builds.

The usual rpmlint warnings for arch-specific Perl packages:

W: perl-Gnome2-GConf devel-file-in-non-devel-package
W: perl-Gnome2-GConf devel-file-in-non-devel-package
W: perl-Gnome2-GConf devel-file-in-non-devel-package

All of which are OK.

I'm going to assume for the purposes of this review that the missing BR:
GConf2-devel is there.

Hmm, it looks like rpmbuild has trouble generating a proper debuginfo package. 
I added this to the end of %build and it does better:

cp xs/* .

I don't know what's up with the seven skipped subtests.  Any idea?

* source files match upstream:
   887b979e04df4adbfd616729cda0f37b  Gnome2-GConf-1.032.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (after adding GConf2-devel.)
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
X debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has only ignorable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl-Gnome2-GConf = 1.032-1.fc6
   perl >= 0:5.008
* %check is present and all tests pass:
        7/11 skipped: basic-gconf-app directory not found in GConf.
   All tests successful, 7 subtests skipped.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers (other than those internal to Perl).
* no pkgconfig files.

Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2006-08-19 00:51:21 UTC
Nuts.  I hate it when I miss obvious BR's....

The skipped tests are due to a gconf client not being available inside the mock
chroot.  There are other tests (a very few) and the dependent tests are properly
skipped, so I didn't nix the test suite.

I'll make the other requested changes and post a new spec/srpm shortly.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2006-08-22 03:13:40 UTC
The package now builds and the debuginfo subpackage looks good.  The only issues
I had have been addressed.


Comment 5 Chris Weyl 2006-08-23 03:24:34 UTC
+Import to CVS
+Add to owners.list
+Bump release, build for devel
+devel build succeeds
+Request branching (FC-5)
+Close bug

Thanks for the review! :)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.