Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2046080 - F36FailsToInstall: qmasterpassword
Summary: F36FailsToInstall: qmasterpassword
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qmasterpassword
Version: 36
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Beat Küng
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2046062
Blocks: F36FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-01-26 09:03 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2022-02-10 14:23 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-10 14:23:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 2046062 1 unspecified CLOSED F36FailsToInstall: libscrypt-devel 2022-02-17 03:34:33 UTC

Description Miro Hrončok 2022-01-26 09:03:51 UTC 
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (qmasterpassword) Fails To Install in Fedora 36:

can't install qmasterpassword:
  - nothing provides libscrypt.so.0(libscrypt)(64bit) needed by qmasterpassword-1.2.2-16.fc36.x86_64
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!
Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2022-02-02 20:09:37 UTC 
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
Comment 2 Beat Küng 2022-02-05 08:16:45 UTC 
I looked into this but I don't see the root cause.
There's a difference in the provided libs for libscrypt in f35 vs rawhide:

f35:
rpm -qP libscrypt
libscrypt = 1.21-16.fc35
libscrypt(x86-64) = 1.21-16.fc35
libscrypt.so.0()(64bit)
libscrypt.so.0(libscrypt)(64bit)

rawhide:
rpm -qP libscrypt
libscrypt = 1.21-17.fc36
libscrypt(x86-64) = 1.21-17.fc36
libscrypt.so.0()(64bit)

I'm not sure why rawhide suddenly misses 'libscrypt.so.0(libscrypt)(64bit)'. Any ideas @mhroncok
Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2022-02-05 08:21:33 UTC 
No ideas. Looping in libscrypt maintainer.

In the meantime, have you tried to build the package in mock or as a scratch build? Does that still require libscrypt.so.0(libscrypt)(64bit)?
Comment 4 Beat Küng 2022-02-07 18:02:32 UTC 
A mock build fails with:
Error:
 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
  - nothing provides libscrypt.so()(64bit) needed by libscrypt-devel-1.21-17.fc36.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)


And building libscrypt in mock, and then trying to install those (mock -r fedora-36-x86_64 --install libscrypt-{,devel-}1.21-17.fc36.x86_64.rpm) results in:
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libscrypt.so()(64bit) needed by libscrypt-devel-1.21-17.fc36.x86_64

Which is weird because:
rpm -qP libscrypt-1.21-17.fc36.x86_64.rpm
libscrypt = 1.21-17.fc36
libscrypt(x86-64) = 1.21-17.fc36
libscrypt.so.0()(64bit)
Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2022-02-07 18:14:05 UTC 
libscrypt.so()(64bit) != libscrypt.so.0()(64bit)

(see the zero)
Comment 6 Beat Küng 2022-02-08 06:52:33 UTC 
Right, of course.
Comment 7 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:06:32 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.
Comment 8 Denis Fateyev 2022-02-09 13:24:21 UTC 
Please proceed with the rebuild once "libscrypt-devel" update is available in testing
Comment 9 Miro Hrončok 2022-02-10 14:16:59 UTC 
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 37.

Thanks for taking care of it!
Comment 10 Miro Hrončok 2022-02-10 14:23:32 UTC 
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 36.

Thanks for taking care of it!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.