Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 206537 - Installation aborts if DHCP unchecked and IP fields empty
Summary: Installation aborts if DHCP unchecked and IP fields empty
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 206538 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FC6Blocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-09-14 21:56 UTC by Jason Farrell
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-18 21:16:33 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jason Farrell 2006-09-14 21:56:36 UTC 
Description of problem:
Installation of FC6T3 aborts at Network setup step if "Use DHCP" in the device 
dialog is unchecked and nothing is input in the IP fields.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go through default install steps until reaching Network devices setup step
2. Select a device (ie "eth0") and click Edit
3. Uncheck the "Use DHCP" checkbox
4. Click OK
  
Actual results:
Installation aborts because of unhandled exception


Expected results:
Input validation of required fields that are empty or bogus

Additional info:

Traceback (most recent call first):
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/network_gui.py", line 456, in editDevice
    if int(val) > 32 or int(val) < 0:
ValueError: invalid literal for int():
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2006-09-14 22:08:02 UTC 
*** Bug 206538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Anssi Johansson 2006-09-17 23:24:04 UTC 
Bug 206678 is probably related to this bug, there are some more user interface /
input validation problems listed in that bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.