Just uploaded -2 build to remedy duplicate menu entries.

http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.0-2.fc6.src.rpm

new emerald installs .desktop menu entries twice

/usr/share/applications/emerald-theme-manager.desktop
/usr/share/applications/fedora-emerald-theme-manager.desktop

Fixed in -3. Stupid oversight and lack of checking the resulting builds on my
part. :)

http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.0-3.fc6.src.rpm

Just pushed out a 0.1.1-1 build.

http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm

It builds on FC5 with this patch :
http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xgl/beryl-manager-0.1.1-intltool.patch
(same stuff as beryl-manager)
I also needed to add this line after intltoolize in prep:
sed -i -e "/^POTFILES/d" po/Makefile.in.in
It looks like this old version of intltool does not insert the content of the
POTFILES file, so there is an annoying leftover backslash which prevents the
CATALOGS from being built.

I'm not sure it's worth working too hard to have beryl/emerald on FC5 now that
FC6 is out.

I think I'm leaning toward agreeing that working on these for FC5 isn't the best
use of time w/FC6 already out. Once all the packages are accepted into Fedora
Extras, perhaps revisit getting them together for FC5 as well.

Latest build, using new upstream tarballs:

http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm

MUST items:
!* rpmlint output:
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/
libpixmap.so ['/usr/lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/
libtruglass.so ['/usr/lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/
libvrunner.so ['/usr/lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/
liboxygen.so ['/usr/lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/
liblegacy.so ['/usr/lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/
libzootreeves.so ['/usr/lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/emerald-theme-manager ['/usr/
lib64']
E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/emerald ['/usr/lib64']
W: emerald-devel no-documentation
 * package is named well
 * spec file name is good
 * package meets Packaging Guidelines
 * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license
 * License field in spec file matches actual license
 * license file is included in %doc
 * md5sums are matching (c273fe82c7e3b2867f05073f3b012708)
 * package successfully compiles on x86_64
 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds well)
 * spec file handles locales properly
 * proper %post and %postun sections
 * not relocatable
 * package owns directories well
 * no duplicates in %files
 * every %files section includes %defattr 
 * proper %clean section
 * macros used well
 * -devel subpackage created good
 * .desktop file present and looks good

THINGS to do:
 * you have to fix rpath issue by adding following lines to %prep section:
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool

Blah, I meant to run rpmlint over all the packages to catch stuff like this...
The suggested fix doesn't work on this package, but adding this to %prep does:

perl -pi -e 's|hardcode_into_libs=.*|hardcode_into_libs=no|g' configure
perl -pi -e 's|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
configure
perl -pi -e 's|runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' configure

New build has that included, rpmlint is (almost) silent:

http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm

$ rpmlint /build/RPMS/x86_64/emerald-*0.1.2-3*
W: emerald-devel no-documentation

(In reply to comment #8)
> Blah, I meant to run rpmlint over all the packages to catch stuff like this...
> The suggested fix doesn't work on this package, but adding this to %prep does:

Hmm... Odd... I tried the solution I suggested and it did work for me.
But your solution works too so nothing stands in the way to approve the package.

APPROVED

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: emerald
New Branches: el6
Owners: leigh123linux

Git done (by process-git-requests).