Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2118159 - F38FailsToInstall: mkdocs
Summary: F38FailsToInstall: mkdocs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: mkdocs
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sandro Mani
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F38FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-08-14 17:09 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2022-09-17 08:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-09-17 08:19:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2022-08-14 17:09:37 UTC 
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (mkdocs) Fails To Install in Fedora 38:

can't install mkdocs:
  - nothing provides (python3.11dist(markdown) < 3.4~~ with python3.11dist(markdown) >= 3.2.1) needed by mkdocs-1.3.1-2.fc37.noarch
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.


P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:

    $ mock -r fedora-38-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install mkdocs


P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!
Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2022-08-22 09:53:52 UTC 
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-13 09:24:01 UTC 
Hello,

This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
Comment 3 Sandro Mani 2022-09-14 08:46:56 UTC 
@mhroncok Blocked on https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/issues/2892#issuecomment-1200518008, I don't see any other option than retiring.
Comment 4 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-14 10:03:03 UTC 
The other option is to package python-markdown3.3 compat package.
Comment 5 Sandro Mani 2022-09-14 10:05:43 UTC 
But it cannot be side-by-side installable with the current python-markdown? Or would mkdocs have to be patched to împort markdown33?
Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-14 10:07:28 UTC 
> But it cannot be side-by-side installable with the current python-markdown?

That is the idea. See e.g.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy1.3
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pytest4 (f34 branch)
Comment 7 Sandro Mani 2022-09-14 10:10:36 UTC 
At this point pip in virtualenv is probably the better solution?
Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-14 10:24:20 UTC 
Of what problem? If you want mkdocs packaged as RPM, pip in virtualenv is not an option.
If you want developers to use mkdocs for their Python projects in Fedroa, pip in virtualenv was always the better option.
Comment 9 Sandro Mani 2022-09-15 08:16:33 UTC 
Right, I think I just took over mkdocs last time it was getting retired - but I see that it is a leaf package, so no real reason for it to exist as an rpm.
Comment 10 Sandro Mani 2022-09-17 08:19:59 UTC 
mkdocs is now retired.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.