Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 217180 - Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library
Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-24 18:23 UTC by Laurent Rineau
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-11-28 13:51:31 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Laurent Rineau 2006-11-24 18:23:16 UTC
Spec URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/wbxml2.spec
SRPM URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/wbxml2-0.9.2-3.src.rpm
Description: 
The WBXML Library (libwbxml) contains a library and its associated tools to
parse, encode and handle WBXML documents. The WBXML format is a binary
representation of XML, defined by the Wap Forum, and used to reduce
bandwidth in mobile communications.

This library is a required by libsyncml (to be submitted latter).

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2006-11-24 23:10:43 UTC
wbxml2 is an orphaned and meanwhile dead.package:
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/wbxml2/FC-5/?root=extras


Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-26 15:22:01 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6.
+ rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM.
+ source files match upstream.
67a48fd9b69db8818a4dca5375c7993a   wbxml2-0.9.2.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named and is cleanly written.
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ COPYING included in %doc.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ libwbxml2.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage exists
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
APPROVED.


Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-26 15:25:49 UTC
Don't forget to CLOSE this bug with resolution NEXTRELEASE

Comment 4 Laurent Rineau 2006-11-27 14:36:08 UTC
Thank you paragn (I cannot know if Parag is a first name or a family name, 
sorry).

As wbxml2 was orphaned. I have to follow the rules of:
  
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages#head-a85a2020dd49e5049bdf20e9bddfede8502e0e32

Well, as far as I can see, I only have to tell fedora-extras-list that I want 
to take over wbxml2.

I have contacted Michael Schwendt (that appears in the former wbxml2 
changelog) by e-mail to know if there was issues that lead to orphaning 
wbxml2.

Perhaps I should also include the former changelog in my new spec file.


Comment 5 Laurent Rineau 2006-11-28 13:51:31 UTC
Build for rawhide. Build job 22503.

I have just submitted a new request, for libsyncml this time. See bug #217524.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.