Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 237110 - Please include dz_BT (Dzongkha) langpack in oo.org
Summary: Please include dz_BT (Dzongkha) langpack in oo.org
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-04-19 13:49 UTC by Marcin Garski
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: openoffice.org-langpack-dz-2.2.1-17.2.fc8
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-31 17:51:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marcin Garski 2007-04-19 13:49:25 UTC 
As we have jomolhari-fonts package in Fedora repo, it would be nice to also add
Dzongkha language pack for OpenOffice.org.
Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2007-04-19 14:22:38 UTC 
For after FC-7 I'll consider it, it's too late IMO for FC-7. I'm not sure what
the quality of the translations are like, but there does at least seem to be
translations for dz
Comment 2 Marcin Garski 2007-04-20 22:50:22 UTC 
I assume the quality is pretty high as it is provided by Bhutanese Department of
Information Technology.
Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2007-04-21 10:30:18 UTC 
Yeah, seems solid.

following my own guidelines of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org

1) Build the langpack only if the locale is supported by glibc (locale -a)

yes, ok

2) Build the langpack only if there is a font available in fedora to render 
that language

yes, ok

3) The langpack should Require: a dictionary for the language if available

I don't see any hunspell/myspell dictionaries for this language, so no extra
hunspell package to require exists, ok
Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2007-05-21 13:51:19 UTC 
checked in to devel, will be in F-8
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.