Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 239078 - need to %ifarch some subpackages
Summary: need to %ifarch some subpackages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: graphviz
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jima
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 238950 239077
Blocks: FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64, F-ExcludeArch-ppc64 239132
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-05-04 19:21 UTC by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-05-22 01:39:30 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bill Nottingham 2007-05-04 19:21:10 UTC 
Description of problem:

Neither mono (bug 238950) nor ocaml (bug 239077) can exist on ppc64. Ergo, these
subpackages need %ifarched.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

graphviz-2.12-6.fc7

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to build.
2.
3. Profit!
  
Actual results:

Oops, no mono or caml. Build fails.

Additional info:
Comment 1 David Woodhouse 2007-05-04 20:22:37 UTC 
The Gentoo folks seem to have ppc64 support for ocaml.
Comment 2 Jima 2007-05-06 02:38:27 UTC 
As David knows, there's an ongoing effort (with his help) to get ocaml working
on ppc64.  I'm not aware of a similar effort for mono, unfortunately.  As a
result, I've disabled the -ocaml and -sharp subpackages, and built 2.12-7.fc7,
which I've requested RelEng include in Fedora 7.  I'll happily re-enable -ocaml
(and -sharp) if/when the BRs are available for ppc64.

I'll update this bug when I hear a final word from RelEng.
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2007-05-22 01:39:30 UTC 
This got tagged
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.