Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 245441 - please add %{arm} to pcmciautils's set of build archs
Summary: please add %{arm} to pcmciautils's set of build archs
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pcmciautils
Version: rawhide
Hardware: arm9
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Harald Hoyer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: ARMTracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-06-23 09:21 UTC by Lennert Buytenhek
Modified: 2008-03-10 11:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-03-10 11:53:39 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch for pcmciautils spec file. (537 bytes, patch)
2007-06-23 09:21 UTC, Lennert Buytenhek
no flags Details | Diff

Description Lennert Buytenhek 2007-06-23 09:21:48 UTC
The pcmciautils package works fine on ARM, but isn't currently built
on ARM.  Please considering applying the attached patch to add %{arm}
to pcmciautils's set of build archs.

Thanks for your time.

Comment 1 Lennert Buytenhek 2007-06-23 09:21:48 UTC
Created attachment 157678 [details]
Patch for pcmciautils spec file.

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2007-10-28 17:41:34 UTC
Does this package actually need ExclusiveArch at all? Is there any Architectures
that this package wouldn't actually build on? According to the documentation of
the Fedora wiki here ExclusiveArch
shouldn't be used unless the package only works on particular Arch (like a boot
loader) and shouldn't use it otherwise so why can't the ExclusiveArch be removed
entirely and if there's any particular Arch that doesn't work add it as a
ExcludeArch instead.

Comment 3 Lennert Buytenhek 2008-03-10 11:53:39 UTC
%{?arm} was added to pcmciautils's ExclusiveArch list in 014-10.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.