Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 392981 - Review Request: xfce4-modemlights-plugin - Modemlights for the Xfce panel
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-modemlights-plugin - Modemlights for the Xfce panel
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 173548
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-11-20 20:25 UTC by Christoph Wickert
Modified: 2014-09-23 12:08 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-12-15 14:39:47 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kevin: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christoph Wickert 2007-11-20 20:25:02 UTC
Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/xfce4-modemlights-plugin.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.3.99-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: A Xfce4 panel applet intended to simplify establishing a ppp connection via a modem.

Comment 1 Christoph Wickert 2007-11-20 20:28:44 UTC
Note: This is a re-review. xfce4-modemlights-plugin hasn't been ported to Xfce
4.4 before, so I orphaned my Xfce 4.2 package after FC-5. The original review
was bug #173548

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-21 03:14:40 UTC
I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a few. 


Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-21 03:39:04 UTC
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
aeab49c57bdaeb12a73486515aae50cd  xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.3.99.tar.bz2
aeab49c57bdaeb12a73486515aae50cd  xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.3.99.tar.bz2.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
See below - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. Wouldn't a better URL be:
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-modemlights-plugin

The Source0 URL seems to be:
http://goodies.xfce.org/releases/xfce4-modemlights-plugin/xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.3.99.tar.bz2

2. rpmlint says:

xfce4-modemlights-plugin.src:65: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr

Might need a %% there to escape that word from macro expansion.

3. Should this 'Requires: ppp' ? Or is it useful without ppp?



Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2007-11-21 10:45:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> 
> Issues:
> 
> 1. Wouldn't a better URL be:
> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-modemlights-plugin
> 
> The Source0 URL seems to be:
>
http://goodies.xfce.org/releases/xfce4-modemlights-plugin/xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.3.99.tar.bz2
> 
> 2. rpmlint says:
> 
> xfce4-modemlights-plugin.src:65: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr
> 
> Might need a %% there to escape that word from macro expansion.

All valid points, seems like I missed some errors when I reworked the spec.

> 
> 3. Should this 'Requires: ppp' ? Or is it useful without ppp?
> 
I have patched the plugin to use ifup/ifdown by default, so theoretically it can
be used for ethernet or wireless devices too, but I guess no one will do that.
So I require ppp now.

SPEC:
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/xfce4-modemlights-plugin.spec
SRPM:
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.3.99-2.fc9.src.rpm

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-21 17:04:16 UTC
Looks all good. This package is APPROVED. 

I will need to remove the Provides in xfce4-panel before it can come in... 
can wait and do that with the upcoming 4.4.2 release, or before if you prefer. 


Comment 6 Christoph Wickert 2007-11-21 19:24:19 UTC
I'll wait until your Xfce 4.4.2 panel arrives.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: xfce4-modemlights-plugin
New Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8
Updated Description: Modemlights for the Xfce panel
("Xfce" was upper case before)

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-22 19:56:48 UTC
cvs done... except for FC-6. We are no longer allowing FC-6 branches. ;( 


Comment 8 Christoph Wickert 2007-11-22 20:25:19 UTC
Ok, I see, but can't we make an exception for this package? I think it would
really be bad to have modemlights in FC <= 5, not in FC6 and then in F >= 7 again.

Comment 9 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-29 19:29:11 UTC
Doesn't look like an exception is going to happen. ;( 

I guess this will just be missing in FC-6. Sorry. 

Comment 10 Christoph Wickert 2007-12-15 14:39:47 UTC
Package is now in the repo, at least for > F-7. Closing.

Comment 11 Mukundan Ragavan 2014-09-23 01:07:12 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name:  xfce4-modemlights-plugin
New Branches: epel7
Owners: cwickert
InitialCC: nonamedotc

Comment 12 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-09-23 12:08:05 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.