Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 507649 - Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 459892
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jan Klepek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-06-23 16:07 UTC by Mamoru TASAKA
Modified: 2009-08-03 22:04 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-24 12:56:02 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2009-06-23 16:07:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mocha/rubygem-mocha.spec
SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mocha/rubygem-mocha-0.9.5-1.fc.src.rpm
Description: 
Mocha is a library for mocking and stubbing using a syntax like
that of JMock. It can be used with many testing frameworks
e.g. Test::Unit, RSpec, test/spec, expectations, Dust, MiniTest
and even JtestR. Mocha provides a unified, simple and readable syntax
for both traditional mocking and partial mocking.

Koji build:
- For dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432058
- For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432060

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-06-23 16:07:41 UTC
*** Bug 459892 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-24 12:56:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 459892 ***

Comment 3 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-24 12:56:55 UTC
Sorry, but not everyone has as much time to pay attention to as much things at a time as you have, but closing my review request as a duplicate of a new review request is just wrong.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.