Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 516311 - Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets
Summary: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-Legal
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-08-08 00:29 UTC by Hicham HAOUARI
Modified: 2010-08-13 14:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: linux-firmware-20100106-4.fc13.noarch
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-18 01:51:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-08 00:29:24 UTC 
Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware123.spec
SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware123-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets

rpmlint output :
ueagle-atm-firmware123.noarch: W: no-documentation
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-12 17:39:34 UTC 
Could you point out where you find the license described?  I don't see it in the tarball, nor at the upstream web site.
Comment 2 Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-14 23:18:53 UTC 
I think I confused it with the license for the package : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 , thinking that both have the same license.

I sent a mail to the firmwares vendor asking them for a clear license.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2009-11-08 04:29:24 UTC 
Without any indication of the license I don't believe that this can be reviewed.  I'll block FE-Legal, but there's not much they can do either without someone indicating the actual license on these files.
Comment 4 Hicham HAOUARI 2009-11-18 01:51:34 UTC 
closing it as wontfix since i didn't get any reponse from Ikanos
Comment 5 Peter Lemenkov 2010-08-13 14:38:06 UTC 
It seems that these blobs were finally added into linux firmware tarball.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.