Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 536941 - [abrt] crash detected in gtkpod-0.99.14-3.fc12
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in gtkpod-0.99.14-3.fc12
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 532484
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gtkpod
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Todd Zullinger
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:03f7983f159e045325825240218...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-11-11 20:58 UTC by Chitlesh GOORAH
Modified: 2009-12-02 13:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-02 13:40:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (deleted)
2009-11-11 20:58 UTC, Chitlesh GOORAH 		no flags Details
View All

Description Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-11 20:58:00 UTC 
abrt detected a crash.

Comment: This crash occured when launching gtkpod with the ipod nano connected via usb.
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: gtkpod
component: gtkpod
executable: /usr/bin/gtkpod
kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686
package: gtkpod-0.99.14-3.fc12
rating: 3
reason: Process was terminated by signal 6
Comment 1 Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-11 20:58:03 UTC 
Created attachment 369104 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Todd Zullinger 2009-11-11 21:13:08 UTC 
This looks a lot like what Paul reported in bug #532484 the other day.  The abrt output isn't identical, but it's pretty similar at a glance.
Comment 3 Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-11 21:16:36 UTC 
I'll be offline till saturday. But don't hesitate to ask me test X Y Z if needed. I'll respond to you during the weekend.
Comment 4 Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 13:40:07 UTC 
Yes indeed it is the same bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 532484 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.