Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 557261 - perl-Padre: /blib contents should be properly installed, not deleted
Summary: perl-Padre: /blib contents should be properly installed, not deleted
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-Padre
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marcela Mašláňová
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 557015
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-20 20:48 UTC by Chris Weyl
Modified: 2010-02-05 09:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-Padre-0.50-2.fc13
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-05 09:45:24 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Weyl 2010-01-20 20:48:15 UTC 
Recent changes in the main Perl package's handling of the module directory structure have resulted in shared files being installed incorrectly, e.. under /blib in the buildroot rather than where they should go.  See bug 557015 for more detail.

Padre leverages install_share() extensively, and the spec file simply removes them rather than installing them in the correct place.  This does not seem conducive to the proper functioning of Padre :)

I believe the proper resolution here would be to correct the issue in the main Perl package; this bug should remain open to track the issue in this package until it has been rebuilt with everything installed as upstream intended.
Comment 1 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-01-21 08:39:11 UTC 
I thought there was mistake in Padre package, but now I'm aware of the problem in perl of Module::Build. Anyway all files are installed and application is functional. I've tested it. Files are "installed" twice into /blib and /usr/share. I'll do removal of 'rm -rf' as soon as building of packages is fixed.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.