Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 564755 - FTBFS pokerth-0.7.1-3.fc13: ImplicitDSOLinking
Summary: FTBFS pokerth-0.7.1-3.fc13: ImplicitDSOLinking
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pokerth
Version: 13
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Susi Lehtola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/Fi...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 564245 583274
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-02-13 16:49 UTC by FTBFS
Modified: 2010-06-14 07:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-14 01:02:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
root.log (698.56 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:49 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
build.log (222.11 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:49 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
mock.log (1.00 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:49 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
root.log (1.04 MB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:49 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
build.log (216.44 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:49 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
mock.log (1.01 KB, text/plain)
2010-02-13 16:49 UTC, FTBFS 		no flags Details
Patch to fix build error (3.23 KB, patch)
2010-06-13 08:59 UTC, Brad Hubbard 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:10 UTC 
pokerth-0.7.1-3.fc13.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
This failure is due to a change in the linker default behavior, which uncovered a fault in your package.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking .
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug.  Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug.  If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one.  Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies.  (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.  Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
Comment 1 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:14 UTC 
Created attachment 391547 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:15 UTC 
Created attachment 391548 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:16 UTC 
Created attachment 391549 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386
Comment 4 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:19 UTC 
Created attachment 391550 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64
Comment 5 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:20 UTC 
Created attachment 391551 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64
Comment 6 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:49:21 UTC 
Created attachment 391552 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64
Comment 7 Susi Lehtola 2010-02-17 13:46:07 UTC 
Reported upstream at
http://www.pokerth.net/forum/17-installation/4079-pokerth-fails-to-build-in-fedora-13#4079
Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2010-03-15 14:39:58 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle.
Changing version to '13'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 9 Brad Hubbard 2010-06-13 08:59:06 UTC 
Created attachment 423603 [details]
Patch to fix build error

As part of a Fedora Engineering Services task I took a look at this and modified two .pro files to include some libraries that were not being included automatically. Please forward the patch upstream.
Comment 10 Susi Lehtola 2010-06-14 01:02:22 UTC 
Ugh, sorry. I fixed this 10 days ago, but didn't notice there was a bug in bugzilla for this.
Comment 11 Brad Hubbard 2010-06-14 07:46:40 UTC 
Never mind, glad it is actively maintained. All the best.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.