Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 578483 - Please add gloox to EPEL-5
Summary: Please add gloox to EPEL-5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 494693
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gloox
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Pavel Alexeev
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-03-31 13:17 UTC by Matěj Cepl
Modified: 2018-04-11 07:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-18 16:03:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Matěj Cepl 2010-03-31 13:17:13 UTC 
Description of problem:
Hi, I am packaging spectrum Jabber gateway (bug 578480) which uses gloox. I would love to get spectrum to EPEL-5 as well, and so I would need gloox in EPEL-5 as well. Would you do it, or should I take over maintainership of gloox in EPEL-5?

Thank you
Comment 1 Pavel Alexeev 2010-03-31 13:32:19 UTC 
If you want maintain gloox for EPEL-5 - feel free do it. Send request and I approve it.

I did try build it for EPEL, and its failed. I did not dig more why.

If you do not want, I can see on it some later, not now.
Comment 2 Pavel Alexeev 2010-04-18 15:32:27 UTC 
*** Bug 582403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Pavel Alexeev 2010-04-18 16:03:05 UTC 
There no needing create such amount of bugs!

Ok, I made change request for EPEL5. This close as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 494693 ***
Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2010-04-18 19:52:24 UTC 
I am sorry for the duplicate (it was honest mistake, I haven't tried to force you), but it would be more convenient to have this bug opened, then I could track whether it was fixed or not. Whatever.
Comment 5 Pavel Alexeev 2010-04-18 20:19:21 UTC 
Please subscribe to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 and you got notification when it changed (CVS granted and then update pushed).
Comment 6 Matěj Cepl 2010-04-21 08:56:56 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Please subscribe to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 and you
> got notification when it changed (CVS granted and then update pushed).    

yeah, except I sometime ignore emails from all CLOSED bugs (with 200+ emails from bugzilla a day, one has to cut corners somewhere). Whatever, not important now.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.