Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 579916 - [abrt] crash in gtkpod-0.99.14-3.fc12: Process /usr/bin/gtkpod was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gtkpod-0.99.14-3.fc12: Process /usr/bin/gtkpod was killed by ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 550365
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gtkpod
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Todd Zullinger
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:5b6b7fbd9f5ccd123eb72f11475...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-04-06 22:29 UTC by Tom Deering
Modified: 2010-05-24 15:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-24 15:07:29 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (deleted)
2010-04-06 22:29 UTC, Tom Deering
no flags Details

Description Tom Deering 2010-04-06 22:29:06 UTC
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: gtkpod
component: gtkpod
executable: /usr/bin/gtkpod
kernel: 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686
package: gtkpod-0.99.14-3.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/gtkpod was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1.Lauch gtkpod
2.Edit iPod properties, Go to playlist tab
3.check on startup automatically sync with playlist directories

Comment 1 Tom Deering 2010-04-06 22:29:07 UTC
Created attachment 404802 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-24 15:07:29 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 550365 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-24 15:07:29 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #550365.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.