Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 739644 - espeak 1.45.05-2 not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Summary: espeak 1.45.05-2 not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: espeak
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: DebugInfo
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-09-19 17:35 UTC by Ville Skyttä
Modified: 2011-09-19 20:13 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-19 18:40:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and $RPM_LD_FLAGS (deleted)
2011-09-19 17:35 UTC, Ville Skyttä
no flags Details | Diff

Description Ville Skyttä 2011-09-19 17:35:43 UTC
Created attachment 523877 [details]
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and $RPM_LD_FLAGS

espeak 1.45.05-2 is not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS; 1.43-4 did not have this problem.

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/espeak/1.45.05/2.fc17/data/logs/x86_64/build.log

Fix attached.  Regarding $RPM_LD_FLAGS this patch adds "while at it", see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155358.html

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2011-09-19 18:40:43 UTC
Ville thanks, applied.

Kamil, such regressions could be caught automatically, couldn't it?
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/194309-autotest/qa06.qa.fedoraproject.org/depcheck/results/espeak-1.45.05-1.fc1.html

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2011-09-19 19:32:05 UTC
I have submitted the script I use to look for problems like this (and which in fact caught this one) to AutoQA about 2 years ago but not much has happened: https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/59

Also, rpmlint has issued errors for empty debuginfo packages and ones without sources for a long time, those too would have caught this one.

Comment 3 Kamil Páral 2011-09-19 20:13:05 UTC
Unfortunately we currently don't have resources to execute these tests. Loads of new proposed test cases, unfinished software architecture and scarce development power. Very sorry :-/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.