Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 829971 - Review Request: samplv1 -A polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
Summary: Review Request: samplv1 -A polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Lemenkov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FedoraAudio
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-07 22:21 UTC by Brendan Jones
Modified: 2012-08-14 00:49 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-14 00:49:22 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
lemenkov: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Brendan Jones 2012-06-07 22:21:40 UTC
samplv1 is a polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx using the Qt toolkit. This package provides both a stand alone application and an LV2 plugin.

SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1.spec

rpmlint /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.src.rpm /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.x86_64.rpm /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lv2-samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.x86_64.rpm
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samplv1_jack
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synth -> synthesis
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

Comment 1 Jørn Lomax 2012-06-15 00:45:12 UTC
You might want to check the URL and the source URL

Comment 2 Brendan Jones 2012-06-15 01:42:39 UTC
Thanks. Updated the URL. Source0 is OK.

SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1-0.0.1-0.2.svn671.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1.spec

Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2012-07-16 07:49:59 UTC
I'll review it

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2012-07-16 08:06:58 UTC
Koji scratchbuild for Rawhide:

* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4242898

REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint emits only non-critical/easyfix/bogus warnings:

work ~/Desktop: rpmlint lv2-samplv1-0.0.1-0.2.svn671.fc18.x86_64.rpm samplv1-*
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synth -> synthesis
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: no-documentation
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://www.rncbc.org/snapshots/samplv1-svn671.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found

^^^ please this this. Proper link is

http://www.rncbc.org/snapshots/old/samplv1-svn671.tar.gz

Note "old/" as a part of the link. Also new version is available:

http://www.rncbc.org/snapshots/samplv1-0.0.8svn759.tar.gz

samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samplv1_jack
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
work ~/Desktop: 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2 or later, as stated in the source files).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.

+/- The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source. Please take a look at my note regarding wrong link.

sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum samplv1-svn671.tar.gz*
6177006a34c7ef1ba456f71d95dd6f47c55f4a6b044b01845082e4915b9ee3be  samplv1-svn671.tar.gz
6177006a34c7ef1ba456f71d95dd6f47c55f4a6b044b01845082e4915b9ee3be  samplv1-svn671.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 


+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
0 The package DOESN'T have a %clean section, so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
0 No C/C++ header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files without a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so) in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 The package doesn't include a %{name}.desktop file.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
0 At the beginning of %install, the package  does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


Please, fix Source0 link before importing. This package is

APPROVED.

Comment 5 Brendan Jones 2012-07-17 15:13:50 UTC
Thanks for the review! Upstream have released a newer version, thus the source error.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: samplv1
Short Description: polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
Owners: bsjones
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-07-18 03:18:51 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-07-26 05:01:45 UTC
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-07-26 22:29:24 UTC
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-08-14 00:49:22 UTC
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.