Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 856858 - Review Request: Jokte - Latam CMS, Joomla Fork
Summary: Review Request: Jokte - Latam CMS, Joomla Fork
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 870181 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-09-13 01:20 UTC by Juan Botero
Modified: 2020-08-10 00:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:46:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Juan Botero 2012-09-13 01:20:29 UTC
Spec URL: http://jpill.fedorapeople.org/jokte/jokte.spec
SRPM URL: http://jpill.fedorapeople.org/jokte/jokte-cms-1.1-1.src.rpm
Description: Jokte is a CMS, created by Latin American Community juuntos.org, is based in Joomla.
Jokte! is totally free, its licence is GPL and trademark is Copyleft.
Fedora Account System Username: jpill

I'm Fedora Ambassador for Colombia, this is my first Package, so, i need an sponsor.

Thanks for attention

Comment 1 Eduardo Echeverria 2012-09-13 02:09:51 UTC
Hi Juan 
Some comments:
Source0: The full URL for the compressed archive containing the (original) pristine source code, as upstream released it. "Source" is synonymous with "Source0". If you give a full URL (and you should), its basename will be used when looking in the SOURCES directory. If possible, embed %{name} and %{version}, so that changes to either will go to the right place. Preserve timestamps when downloading source files. If there is more than one source, name them Source1, Source2 and so on. If you're adding whole new files in addition to the pristine sources, list them as sources after the pristine sources. A copy of each of these sources will be included in any SRPM you create, unless you specifically direct otherwise. See Source URL for more information on special cases (e.g. revision control). 

Summary: A brief, one-line summary of the package. Use American English. Do not end in a period. 

%description: A longer, multi-line description of the program. Use American English. All lines must be 80 characters or less. Blank lines indicate a new paragraph. Some graphical user interface installation programs will reformat paragraphs; lines that start with whitespace will be treated as preformatted text and displayed as is, normally with a fixed-width fo

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_file_overview

Changelog Example:
%changelog
* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng.org> - 2.1.5-21
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild

* Fri Jul 02 2010 Kamil Dudka <kdudka> 2.1.5-20
- handle multi-partition devices with spaces in mount points properly (#608502)

Use rpmlint to check the errors on SRPMS and RPM 
Regards

Comment 2 Eduardo Echeverria 2012-09-13 02:15:14 UTC
If this is your first need a sponsor package, put the block FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Comment 3 Juan Botero 2012-09-13 03:19:57 UTC
Hello Eduardo.

Thanks for checking, one question.

This
If possible, embed %{name} and
%{version}, so that changes to either will go to the right place.

Means at the beginning of spec file?

Name: jokte-cms
Version: 1.1

Replace With
Name: jokte-cms1.1

Thanks.

Comment 4 Eduardo Echeverria 2012-09-13 03:29:36 UTC
Hi juan, this can help
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

Comment 5 Juan Botero 2012-09-13 04:44:20 UTC
Hello.

I updated the Spec file: http://jpill.fedorapeople.org/jokte/jokte-cms.spec
and the SRPM too: http://jpill.fedorapeople.org/jokte/jokte-cms-1.1-1.src.rpm

Thanks again.

Comment 6 Luis Bazan 2012-09-13 14:16:34 UTC
Hi Juan 

these is a example:

Name:           jokte-cms
Version:        1.1
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        Latin American CMS, fork of Joomla CMS
License:        GPL
Group:          Applications/Internet
URL:            https://github.com/JokteLatinoamerica/
Source0:        https://github.com/downloads/JokteLatinoamerica/jokte-cms/Jokte-cms-v1.1.tar.gz
BuildArch:      noarch
 
Requires:       mysql >= 5.0
BuildRequires:  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Review the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package/es#Creando_un_archivo_spec

remember check use rpmlint
and try test in koji 

Regards!

Comment 7 Juan Botero 2012-09-13 17:09:25 UTC
I updated the spec file with release tag.

Thanks.

Comment 8 Luis Bazan 2012-10-08 15:34:43 UTC
Ping, any progress here?

Comment 9 Juan Botero 2012-10-22 15:41:56 UTC
Hello.

I Now have the Spec File, updated in: http://jpill.fedorapeople.org/jokte/

The koji build in: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4481815

but i don't know what do i miss?

Comment 10 Michael Schwendt 2012-12-05 21:10:54 UTC
*** Bug 870181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:46:06 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 12 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:46:07 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.