Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 910150 - Review Request: nodejs-express - Sinatra inspired web development framework for Node.js
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-express - Sinatra inspired web development framework f...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: T.C. Hollingsworth
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 910116 910119 910121 910123 910124 910127 910134 910140 910142 910148
Blocks: 910154
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-02-11 22:01 UTC by Jamie Nguyen
Modified: 2013-06-16 18:31 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: nodejs-express-3.2.5-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-19 14:16:14 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
tchollingsworth: fedora-review+
pbabinca: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jamie Nguyen 2013-02-11 22:01:02 UTC
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/nodejs-express.spec
SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-buddycloud-http-api/SRPMS/nodejs-express-3.0.6-1.fc18.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: jamielinux

Description:
This Node.js module is a fast, unopinionated, minimalist web development
framework inspired by Sinatra.

The Express philosophy is to provide small, robust tooling for HTTP servers.
Making it a great solution for single page applications, web sites, hybrids,
or public HTTP APIs.

Built on Connect you can use only what you need, and nothing more,
applications can be as big or as small as you like, even a single file.
Express does not force you to use any specific ORM or template engine. With
support for over 14 template engines via Consolidate.js you can quickly craft
your perfect framework.

Comment 3 T.C. Hollingsworth 2013-03-16 00:06:03 UTC
Sorry for the delay, I was beating my head up against the wall trying to
figure out why mock wasn't working the other day, and it turned out it was
becasue there were no packages in the repository whatsoever!
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-March/180065.html

Package Review
==============

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

Status: NEEDS WORK

==== Issues ====

[!]: Latest version (3.1.0) is not packaged.

     Please package the latest version or provide a rationale for packaging an
     older version.

===== Things to Consider ====

[ ]: The command line utility `express` does not have a man page.

     Consider working with upstream to include one.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.

MIT in LICENSE file, OK.

[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
     Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
  
===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
     Note: Source0 (express-3.1.0.tgz) Source1 (tests-3.1.0.tar.bz2) Source10
     (dl-tests.sh)
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

Disabled, missing deps so OK.

[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: nodejs-express-3.1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
          nodejs-express-3.1.0-2.fc20.noarch.rpm
nodejs-express.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-express.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-express.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unopinionated -> opinionated
nodejs-express.src: W: strange-permission dl-tests.sh 0755L
nodejs-express.src: W: invalid-url Source1: tests-3.1.0.tar.bz2
nodejs-express.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-express.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-express.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unopinionated -> opinionated
nodejs-express.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/cookie-signature /usr/lib/node_modules/cookie-signature
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/buffer-crc32 /usr/lib/node_modules/buffer-crc32
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/connect /usr/lib/node_modules/connect
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/methods /usr/lib/node_modules/methods
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/mkdirp /usr/lib/node_modules/mkdirp
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/range-parser /usr/lib/node_modules/range-parser
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/commander /usr/lib/node_modules/commander
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/fresh /usr/lib/node_modules/fresh
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/cookie /usr/lib/node_modules/cookie
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/send /usr/lib/node_modules/send
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/debug /usr/lib/node_modules/debug
nodejs-express.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary express
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 21 warnings.

Consider asking upstream or adding a manpage, everything else is false positive.


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint nodejs-express
nodejs-express.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-express.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-express.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unopinionated -> opinionated
nodejs-express.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/cookie-signature /usr/lib/node_modules/cookie-signature
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/buffer-crc32 /usr/lib/node_modules/buffer-crc32
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/connect /usr/lib/node_modules/connect
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/methods /usr/lib/node_modules/methods
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/mkdirp /usr/lib/node_modules/mkdirp
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/range-parser /usr/lib/node_modules/range-parser
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/commander /usr/lib/node_modules/commander
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/fresh /usr/lib/node_modules/fresh
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/cookie /usr/lib/node_modules/cookie
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/send /usr/lib/node_modules/send
nodejs-express.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/express/node_modules/debug /usr/lib/node_modules/debug
nodejs-express.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary express
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'

Same as above.

Requires
--------
nodejs-express-3.1.0-2.fc20.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    
    nodejs(engine)
    npm(buffer-crc32) < 1
    npm(buffer-crc32) >= 0.1
    npm(commander) < 1.2
    npm(commander) >= 1.1
    npm(connect) < 2.8
    npm(connect) >= 2.7.2
    npm(cookie) = 0.0.5
    npm(cookie-signature) = 0.0.1
    npm(debug)
    npm(fresh) = 0.1.0
    npm(methods) = 0.0.1
    npm(mkdirp) < 0.4
    npm(mkdirp) >= 0.3
    npm(range-parser) = 0.0.4
    npm(send) = 0.1.0

OK

Provides
--------
nodejs-express-3.1.0-2.fc20.noarch.rpm:
    
    nodejs-express = 3.1.0-2.fc20
    npm(express) = 3.1.0

OK

MD5-sum check
-------------
http://registry.npmjs.org/express/-/express-3.1.0.tgz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 3dd5ff44601865202b8c48103dafc0fe855dc17c7668cb1f9c9ce8bda0c5b82d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3dd5ff44601865202b8c48103dafc0fe855dc17c7668cb1f9c9ce8bda0c5b82d

OK

Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (f4bc12d) last change: 2012-10-16
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-vanilla-x86_64
Command line :./try-fedora-review -b910150

Comment 4 Jamie Nguyen 2013-03-16 06:20:52 UTC
[!]: Latest version (3.1.0) is not packaged.

Comment #2 already has spec for 3.1.0, so I assume fedora-review pulled down the wrong spec.


> [ ]: The command line utility `express` does not have a man page.
> 
>      Consider working with upstream to include one.

Custom man page added and pull request sent upstream:
https://github.com/visionmedia/express/pull/1545

Comment 5 T.C. Hollingsworth 2013-03-16 06:24:09 UTC
Sorry about that.  APPROVED.

Comment 6 Jamie Nguyen 2013-03-16 06:26:30 UTC
No problem, and thanks!

Comment 7 Jamie Nguyen 2013-03-16 06:27:28 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: nodejs-express
Short Description: Sinatra inspired web development framework for Node.js
Owners: jamielinux
Branches: f18 f19 el6
InitialCC:

Comment 8 Pavol Babinčák 2013-03-18 08:50:39 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-03-18 20:14:27 UTC
nodejs-express-3.1.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-express-3.1.0-3.fc18

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2013-04-07 00:26:19 UTC
nodejs-express-3.1.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2013-05-25 16:41:06 UTC
nodejs-express-3.2.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-express-3.2.5-1.el6

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-06-16 18:31:02 UTC
nodejs-express-3.2.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.