Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 924971 - adonthell: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide
Summary: adonthell: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: adonthell
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mathieu Bridon
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ARM64, F-ExcludeArch-aarch64
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-22 23:59 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2014-06-22 18:10 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-22 18:10:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-03-22 23:59:18 UTC
Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in 
autoconf 2.69.  adonthell appears to use an earlier version of 
autoconf, preventing its being built.  This can be fixed in of three ways (In order of preference):

1. Work with upstream to migrate the package to autoconf 2.69.

2. Rerun autoconf or autoreconf in %prep or %build prior to running 
configure.

3. Apply the patch at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/aarch64/adonthell/adonthell-aarch64.patch
which updates config.guess and config.sub to recognize aarch64.

Comment 1 Mathieu Bridon 2013-03-24 04:06:16 UTC
There probably won't be any new release of adonthell before a while, as upstream has been working for a long time now on the new version, which is quite ambitious and they have extremely few developers.

So option 1 doesn't seem likely (at least not for the current version).

Option 2 could become nasty very quickly, if they use old/deprecated stuff in their autotools stuff, and again, they probably wouldn't be interested in the fixes for this version.

So option 3 seems like the best way for this package.

I don't quite understand what the patch does, and I have no idea about aarch64, so if you're a provenpackager, feel free to just go ahead and apply the patch and rebuild. :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.