Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 990617 - gperftools-devel not in ARM build - breaking dependancies
Summary: gperftools-devel not in ARM build - breaking dependancies
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 979687
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gperftools
Version: rawhide
Hardware: arm
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 990602
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-07-31 14:45 UTC by Troy Dawson
Modified: 2013-07-31 14:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-07-31 14:50:43 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Troy Dawson 2013-07-31 14:45:32 UTC 
Description of problem:
Packages that depend on gperftools-devel cannot build on rawhide, because rawhide now builds with armv7hl, and gperftools-devel isn't being pulled in.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
If I had a release number, I'd have a package, which there isn't one of.

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have a package that is not a no-arch, that depends on gperftools-devel.
2. Try to build it on rawhide
3.

Actual results:
In root.log for armv7hl you'll get
 Error: No Package found for gperftools-devel
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5683983

Expected results:
gperftools-devel installed and build proceeds as usual.

Additional info:
This was not happening on the arm-koji build machines a week ago.

http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=156970
Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2013-07-31 14:50:43 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 979687 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.