Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 994018 - pam_mapi possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change
Summary: pam_mapi possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pam_mapi
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert Scheck
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F20UnversionedDocDirs
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-06 13:56 UTC by Ville Skyttä
Modified: 2013-08-06 17:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pam_mapi-0.1.2-4.fc20
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-06 17:47:25 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ville Skyttä 2013-08-06 13:56:36 UTC 
pam_mapi was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention
due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not
foolproof, it is basically this grep:

    grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec

Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A
good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for
your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes,
the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc
should no longer contain the package version.

More information and tips:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2013-08-06 14:03:19 UTC 
Ville, which macro can be used across old and new behaviour? From what I get,
%_docdir_fmt can not be used directly in *.spec files. Is known how RHEL 7 is
going to behave regarding this? Will they also switch?
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2013-08-06 14:34:17 UTC 
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #1)
> Ville, which macro can be used across old and new behaviour?

See first link in the initial comment, and the "Detailed Description" section in it. I'd imagine if you use plain %doc or %{_pkgdocdir} as suggested, you don't need to know what EL7 is going to do (I don't).
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2013-08-06 17:47:25 UTC 
Sorry, did not recognize the new %{_pkgdocdir} macro.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.