Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1591293 - [Tracker][RFE] Support device block size of 4096 bytes (depends on RHV bug 1592916 )
Summary: [Tracker][RFE] Support device block size of 4096 bytes (depends on RHV bug 15...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1721020
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: rhhi
Version: rhhi-1.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Sahina Bose
QA Contact: SATHEESARAN
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1592916 1720923 1734429
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-06-14 13:35 UTC by John Call
Modified: 2019-07-30 14:12 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1592916 1720923 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-17 07:29:22 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description John Call 2018-06-14 13:35:50 UTC 
Description of problem:
RHV fails to create a Storage Domain when storage with native 4k sectors are present.  For RHHI in particular, the Gluster volume is successfully created, but RHVM reports a non-specific failure when adding the Storage Domain.  The 512-byte emulation workaround is not available with new 4kN (e.g. 4k Native) drives.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
All versions of RHV and RHHI


Additional info:
Yaniv Lavi requested this RHHI-specific bug be created.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798947#c12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364869#c25

Sahina Bose shared a summary of an internal conversation on Jun 13, 2018
"I did discuss this with Yaniv Kaul and Doron F yesterday, and they mentioned they need to change the storage domain metatadata format and also cover the use cases of migrating older storage domains - hence requires a detailed design. I think this is the background for Yaniv Lavi's request - if we can focus support to RHHI specific use cases."
Comment 4 Gobinda Das 2019-06-17 07:29:22 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1721020 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.