Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1720923 - [Tracker][RFE] Support device block size of 4096 bytes (depends on RHV bug 1592916 )
Summary: [Tracker][RFE] Support device block size of 4096 bytes (depends on RHV bug 15...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1592916
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: BLL.Gluster
Version: future
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Sahina Bose
QA Contact: SATHEESARAN
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1592916 1734429
Blocks: 1591293
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-06-16 15:38 UTC by Gobinda Das
Modified: 2019-07-30 14:12 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1591293
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-17 07:22:22 UTC
oVirt Team: Gluster
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: planning_ack?
pm-rhel: devel_ack?
pm-rhel: testing_ack?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gobinda Das 2019-06-16 15:38:13 UTC
Description of problem:
RHV fails to create a Storage Domain when storage with native 4k sectors are present.  For RHHI in particular, the Gluster volume is successfully created, but RHVM reports a non-specific failure when adding the Storage Domain.  The 512-byte emulation workaround is not available with new 4kN (e.g. 4k Native) drives.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
All versions of RHV and RHHI


Additional info:
Yaniv Lavi requested this RHHI-specific bug be created.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798947#c12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364869#c25

Sahina Bose shared a summary of an internal conversation on Jun 13, 2018
"I did discuss this with Yaniv Kaul and Doron F yesterday, and they mentioned they need to change the storage domain metatadata format and also cover the use cases of migrating older storage domains - hence requires a detailed design. I think this is the background for Yaniv Lavi's request - if we can focus support to RHHI specific use cases"

Comment 1 Gobinda Das 2019-06-17 07:22:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1592916 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.