Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 197293 - Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt
Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Prompt
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 197304
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-06-29 23:39 UTC by Chris Weyl
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-03 17:56:19 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Weyl 2006-06-29 23:39:12 UTC
Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-IO-Prompt.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-IO-Prompt-v0.99.4-0.fc5.src.rpm
Description: 
An object-oriented way to query for user input -- and control how that input is obtained.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-06-30 00:43:49 UTC
Note that BuildRequires: perl is redundant, and perl(Test::More),
perl(IO::Handle) and perl(POSIX) are all provided by the base Perl package.

The test suite skips some tests because of missing modules; you should add BR:
perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) for better test coverage.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* source files match upstream:
   c62e369783af1f3dfe775e5d80686b61  IO-Prompt-v0.99.4.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(IO::Prompt)
   perl(IO::Prompt::ReturnVal)
   perl-IO-Prompt = v0.99.4-0.fc6
  =
   perl >= 0:5.008
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(IO::Handle)
   perl(POSIX)
   perl(Term::ReadKey)
   perl(Want)
   perl(strict)
   perl(version)
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
X %check is present and all tests pass; however, some tests are skipped due to
missing modules.
   All tests successful, 2 tests skipped.
   Files=3, Tests=1,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr +  0.02 csys =  0.12 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2006-06-30 01:00:16 UTC
Updated with additional buildreqs.

Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-IO-Prompt.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-IO-Prompt-v0.99.4-0.1.fc5.src.rpm

(note the "odd" release #'s are just so I can release the initial build inside
extras as "-1")

Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2006-07-03 17:15:21 UTC
The test suite now passes with no tests skipped:
   All tests successful.
   Files=3, Tests=3,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr +  0.05 csys =  0.25 CPU)

There is this warning:
t/pod-coverage....Too late to run CHECK block at
/builddir/build/BUILD/IO-Prompt-v0.99.4/blib/lib/IO/Prompt.pm line 315.

which might be useful to report upstream.  I'm not sure what it means.

APPROVED

Comment 4 Chris Weyl 2006-07-03 17:55:46 UTC
Imported and building for devel -- will build for FC-4, FC-5 after branching.

CHECK issue will be reported upstream.

Thanks!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.