Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 199834 - Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system
Summary: Review Request: nip2 - interactive image processing system
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jochen Schmitt
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On: 199833
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-07-23 02:46 UTC by Adam Goode
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-08-01 18:26:15 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Goode 2006-07-23 02:46:21 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: nip2 is a graphical front end to the VIPS package.
With nip2, rather than directly editing images, you build
relationships between objects in a spreadsheet-like fashion. When you
make a change somewhere, nip2 recalculates the objects affected by
that change. Since it is demand-driven this update is very fast, even
for very, very large images.

Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2006-07-23 20:15:22 UTC
+ Tar ball match with upstream source.

- Can't find vips-devel as BR.

Comment 2 Adam Goode 2006-07-23 22:06:49 UTC
Check out bug #199833 for vips.

Comment 3 Jochen Schmitt 2006-07-24 16:14:35 UTC
+ rpmlint on source rpm is quite.
+ Local build works fine.
+ rpmlint on binary rpms is quite
+ rpmlint on installed rpm is quite.
+ Application have a desktop entry.
+ Applcation can start without crash.

I may able to aprove your package after vips is aproved and I have done a mock

Comment 4 Adam Goode 2006-07-28 14:04:23 UTC
vips is now in extras and builds successfully on all releases and platforms.

What's left to do for nip2?

Comment 5 Jochen Schmitt 2006-08-01 18:26:15 UTC
OK, I have done a mock build which works fine. So I can APPROVE your package.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.